Skip to main content

What might the US election mean for energy commodities?

The initial uncertainty created by what would now be a shock win for Donald Trump in November’s US presidential election would surely be negative for the prices of industrial commodities, including energy. Over the longer term, Trump’s more favourable stance towards fossil fuels could be positive for the prices of oil and especially coal, although much would still depend on whether new policies have a bigger impact on demand or on supply. In contrast, a Clinton win is probably already priced in and near-term prospects would then continue to depend on current drivers, notably the actions of OPEC. But Clinton would strengthen existing trends towards more use of natural gas and renewables such as solar.

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.