Skip to main content

Will EMs pick up the free-trade mantle?

There is growing speculation that the largest EMs might step up to fill the void left by the US in the event of a protectionist shift under President Trump. However, there are good reasons why intra-EM trade deals – or indeed EM-led global trade deals – might struggle to get off the ground and, even if they do, why the economic impact might be smaller than many anticipate. First, while several EMs clearly sense an opportunity from any pull-back by the US, there are significant practical challenges to them picking up the free-trade mantle. In particular, the trade agreements that have been proposed by EMs – including China’s Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which has been floated as a rival to TPP – have typically focussed on lowering trade tariffs. Yet after two decades of globalisation, these are already at historic lows.

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.