Skip to main content

Is a Universal Basic Income feasible?

The idea of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) in India has gained attention in recent weeks. While a UBI could go a long way towards eradicating poverty and reducing the problems with the current welfare system, its high fiscal cost and a lack of necessary financial infrastructure make it implausible for now. While there is merit to introducing a UBI, there are major problems. The most obvious is the large fiscal cost. The Economic Survey estimates that a UBI of INR7,620 (US$113) a year would almost completely eradicate absolute poverty in India. This appears to be a low number, given that the World Bank’s definition of the global poverty line equates to over US$600 a year. Nevertheless, even if we use the numbers from the Economic Survey, a payment of INR7,620 a year to all of India’s 1.25bn people would cost around INR10trn per annum, equivalent to 8% of GDP. Subsidy expenditure was worth 1.7% of GDP in FY15/16, while we estimate that other welfare programmes (such as the child development and rural income schemes) totalled another 3% of GDP. Even if these existing programmes were totally scrapped and replaced by the UBI, this would still leave an additional cost of 3.3% of GDP. This is almost as large as the existing budget deficit.

Subscriber content

Read this in full, free

Start a free trial and use one of your 10 free starter credits to unlock this piece.


Free. 10 articles. No card required.

By completing this form you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions for the provision of a free trial of Capital Economics' services. We take your privacy seriously and will not share your details with others without your consent. By providing your details, including your email address, you are consenting to Capital Economics sending you macroeconomic commentary and analysis. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.